Browse Tag

Sabah - Page 5

Explorer Franz Witti and his death by sumpitan in British North Borneo

Francis Xavier Witti or also known as Franz Witti, was one of the first few Europeans to explore the northern part of Borneo.

He was a former navy officer in the Austro-Hungarian Empire and avid explorer.

When Witti came in contact with German adventurer and diplomat Baron Gustav von Overbeck during his journey through Southeast Asia, he was introduced to North Borneo.

Witti was thrilled to know that this place had never been completely explored by any Europeans before.

After his short visit in North Borneo, he went to Europe to look for a job with the British North Borneo Company.

However, he was scared that his nationality would prevent him from getting the job, he then decided to return to Borneo on his own.

In North Borneo, Witti conducted various survey reports in the area. Hence, the British North Borneo Company finally officially hired him in 1877.

Under the company, Witti was in-charge of carrying out expeditions of exploration while identifying the natural resources in the area.

Through these explorations, he became the first European to visit some of the places in North Borneo.

The founding of Kudat town and debunking the idea of Kinabalu Lake

During one of his explorations, Witti discovered oil about 26 km outside present-day Kudat town.

It is assumed that this might be the reason why the Company chose Kudat as their first settlement in British North Borneo.

The town was officially founded on Dec 7, 1881.

Besides the discovery of oil, Witti was one of the first explorers who confirmed that there was no such thing as Kinabalu lake.

In the olden days, the locals believed that there was a great lake at the peak of Mount Kinabalu.

However, the earliest documented expedition to Mount Kinabalu in 1851 and 1858, unveiled the fact that there was no lake.

How did the local people come to believe there was a lake on the submit?

It was believed that during the Ice Age, Mount Kinabalu was covered with ice sheets and glaciers moving slowly down its slopes. As the glaciers moved down, it was possible that the locals could only see the peak. Since it is surrounded by glistening sheets of ice, it looked like there was a lake right below the summit.

mount kinabalu 2404697 1280
In the olden days, it was believed there was a huge lake right beneath Mount Kinabalu.

The summary of Franz Witti’s journey

Admiral Richard Charles Mayne (1835-1892) was a Royal Navy officer and a fellow of the Royal Geographical Society.

During a meeting of the society on Jan 30, 1888, he gave a summary of explorations in British North Borneo.

One of the sources of his presentation for the meeting was Witti’s diaries.

According to his diary, Witti started his journey under the Company from the northwestern end of Marudu Bay on Nov 10, 1880, reaching Papar on Dec 5.

Mayne stated, “This was a long arduous journey, occupying twenty-five days and covering some 150 miles. Passing well to the east of Mount Kinabalu, striking the headwaters of the Sugut river, which flows into the north of Labuk Bay on the east coast, and then turning west to the Padas and Papar rivers, he passed through several villages, varying in size, at all of which the party were hospitably treated.”

Mayne pointed out that Witti had to bribe one of the natives to take him exploringaround Mount Kinabalu. While the local was happy to have a petticoat for his wife (thanks to Witti’s bribery), he was reportedly so scared a big fish would devour them once they discovered the legendary Kinabalu lake. Thankfully, the big fish and the lake never existed in the first place.

As for Witti’s second journey which took place between May 13 and June 17, 1881, he travelled from the head of Marudu Bay to east heading to Sandakan.

In Witti’s own words, he described how excited his local companions were. He wrote, “They questioned one another, ‘What will my employers say? What will our old men at Tempassuk say?’ is the query with me. We did not achieve great things, but the little we did outside the round of everyday business will serve the purpose which it was done; whenever we came to a place for the first time, there we dare show our face again.”

Witti’s third and last journey – which he lost his life – was undertaken on Mar 9, 1882, nearly a year after the second.

He travelled through Kimanis until he reached Pagalan river.

According to Mayne, Witti’s journal ended abruptly on Mar 28. Interestingly, the Dutch sent the copy of his diary to the society some time after Witti’s death.

It is understood that he arrived in a place called Limbawan, somewhere near Keningau. There the local Murut chief named Jeludin warned him not to travel to Peluan (Paluan). This is because there was a feud between Jeludin’s country of Nabai and Peluan.

Nabai and Peluan are tribes belonged to the Murut ethnic group. In the olden days, Murut Nabai lived mainly in Keningau while the Murut Peluan were found near the Padas river in Tenom.

The last European to see him alive was his colleague L.B von Donop in Tambunan. His final letter was written on June 11, 1882, writing from “Naloyan, Dalit”.

The letter was a reply to his boss Sir William Hood Treacher, the first Governor of North Borneo (1881-1887).

Treacher ordered Witti to return to the coast. Instead, he insisted on travelling into the interior where he met his death only a few miles from the Dutch border of Kalimantan.

British Governor of North Borneo’s account of Franz Witti’s death

Speaking of Treacher, Witti’s death was recorded in his book, British Borneo: sketches of Brunai, Sarawak, Labuan and North Borneo (1891).

Treacher gave his account on what happened on that fateful day when Witti died.

“The two principal pioneer explorers of British North Borneo were Witti and Frank Hatton, both of whom met with violent deaths.

“Witti’s services as one of the first officers stationed in the country, before the British North Borneo Company was formed, have already been referred to, and I have drawn on his able report for a short account of the slave system which formerly prevailed.

“He had served in the Austrian Navy and was a very energetic, courageous and accomplished man.

“Besides minor journeys, he had traversed the country from West to East from North to South, and inland to the headwaters of the Kinabatangan and Sambakong Rivers, that he was murdered by a tribe, whose language none of his party understood, but whose confidence he had endeavoured to win by reposing confidence in them, to the extent even of letting them carry his carbine.

‘He and his men had slept in the village one night, and on the following day some of tribe joined the party as guides, but led them into ambuscade, where the gallant Witti and many of his men were killed by sumpitan (blowpipe).

‘So far as we have been able to ascertain the sole reaction for the attack was the fact that Witti had come to the district from a tribe with whom these people were at war, and he was, therefore, according to native customs, deemed also to be an enemy.”

The last two months of his diary and geographical records that he took were reportedly lost during the attack.

Franz Witti
Screenshot of ‘Early explorers fatal destiny in the jungle of Sabah‘ by Mario M.a. Wannier.

Franz Witti was killed by a spear not by blowpipe

Meanwhile, Witti’s colleague and a fellow explorer recorded what he heard had happened in a letter to his mother from Kudat on Oct 28, 1882.

He told his mother, “Poor Witti! He was travelling in a Murut country, and having slept in a native’s home, left the place next morning with his eleven men. They had a small native-made boat, in which they were going down stream. They came to a shallow place, where every one had to get out into the water and drag the boat. The rifles and weapons were put in the perahu. Witti waded ashore to make some notes. In the middle of all this they were attacked by some hundreds of savages, who fell upon Witti and his unfortunate men with spears, sumpitans, swords etc. Witti, it is said, had a spear thrust through his body; and even after receiving this awful wound, he turned and fired his revolver six times. Four cartridges were damp and did not explode, with the other two he killed two men. Of the rest of his followers, three escaped to tell the sad tale, the others were killed or died in the bush.”

Frank Hatton
Frank Hatton.

Franz Witti knew about the dangers that came with his exploration

Exploring a new country where headhunting was still rampant always came with a price. And the cost of that price for these explorers sometimes is their heads.

As for Witti, he knew the circumstances surrounding his work as an explorer. It was believed that before Witti left Kimanis, he made a will and arranged for the settlements of all his affairs.

As Owen Rutter in British North Borneo: an account of its history, resources, and native tribes wrote, “His (Witti’s) intrepid courage, unfailing humour and disregard or personal comfort mark him as a true explorer, his tact in dealing with natives and his great black beard made him remembered by those among whom he went. ‘Whenever we came to a place for the first time,’ he says in one of his diaries, ‘there we dare show our faces again,’ and the fact he should have met his death at the hands of unthinking savages whose cause he had at heart does but enhance the tragedy of his fate.”

After his death, there were rumours of his body coming through the river flowing into the Dutch territory (Kalimantan). However, this rumour has never been confirmed.

The news of Witti’s death in the hand of headhunters was certainly viral-worthy even in the 19th century. It even made it to the New York Times on Oct 30, 1882 months after his death presumably in June, with the headline “Slain by Borneo Savages; Mr Witti’s Sad Fortunes in the Land of the Head-Hunters.” He was just 32 years old when he died.

In Sandakan, the Chartered Company Monument is built in dedication to the British servicemen or employees who were killed at the end of the 19th century. These servicemen included Witti and Hatton, who died in 1883.

10 things you might not know about the Sandakan Death Marches

Some of you might have heard of the Sandakan Death Marches. It is a series of forced marches from Sandakan to Ranau cutting through the dense rainforest of Borneo.

Overall, there were 2,434 Allied prisoners of war (POWs) died during their internment at Sandakan camp and the marches to Ranau.

It is widely considered to be the single worst atrocity suffered by Australian servicemen during the World War II (WWII).

After the Battle of Singapore in February 1942, Australian and British POWs were captured and sent to Borneo between 1942 and 1943.

They were interned at Sandakan POWs camp and forced to build a military airstrip.

Just like how the POWs were forced to build the Burma Railway, these prisoners were forced to work at gunpoint with little food to eat.

To worsen the situation, they were given little to no medical attention.

By August 1943, the officer prisoners were moved from Sandakan to Batu Lintang camp in Kuching in order to take more control of the prisoners. This turned out to be a blessing-in-disguise for the officers.

As for those who were left behind in Sandakan, the condition deteriorated significantly following the officers’ removal.

Their food were further reduced and even sick prisoners were forced to work on the airstrip.

Once the airstrip was completed, the prisoners initially still remained at the Sandakan camp.

About The Sandakan Death Marches

In January 1945, the Allied forces successfully dropped a bomb, destroying the airfield. At that time, there were only 1,900 POWs alive at the came.

After the bombing, Captain Hoshijima Susumi ordered the remaining prisoners to march to Ranau, about 260 kilometers away.

The first march took place between January and March 1945. The Japanese picked 470 prisoners whom they thought to be fit enough to carry baggage and supplies. Although the journey supposed to take nine days, the first group was given enough rations for four days.

Meanwhile, the second series of the marches started on May 29, 1945. About 536 prisoners were ordered to march toward Ranau in groups of fifty with accompanying Japanese guards.

The second march lasted for 26 days. With prisoners less fit than the first march, they were even given fewer rations. In the end, only 183 prisoners reached Ranau on June 24, 1945. That was when they found out, there were only six prisoners still alive from the first march.

After the second march prisoners departed, the Sandakan camp was left with about 250 POWs.

At first, since they were so sick, the Japanese initially planned to let them die of starvation. However, on June 9, 1945, the Japanese ordered the final group of 75 men to head to Ranau.

They were so weak, none of them survived beyond 50 kilometres. When a man collapsed from exhaustion, the Japanese guard shot him. In the meantime, the remaining prisoners left at the camp eventually died from sickness or starvation or both.

Here are 10 more facts about the Sandakan Death Marches:

Sandakan Death Marches
The Australian Imperial Forces section of a cemetery at Sandakan camp. Credits: Australian War Memorial

1.Not all 2,428 died during the Sandakan Death Marches

The biggest misconception about the Sandakan Death Marches that there was a total of 2,428 Australian and British POWs died during the marches.

According to historian and author Lynette Ramsay Silver, 1,047 died during the marches which took place between January and June 1945.

Meanwhile, the remaining 1,381 never left the Sandakan camp. They perished due to sickness, starvation or execution by the Japanese Imperial soldiers.

Kundasang War Memorial 3
The Kundasang War Memorial  is a memorial located in Kundasang, near Ranau which is dedicated to the British and Australian soldiers who died in the Sandakan POW camp during their death marches to Ranau.

2.The last known Sandakan Death Marches track cutter died in 2018.

Tuaty Akau was the last known Sandakan Death March track cutter. He died on his birthday on Oct 29, 2018, aged 105.

During WWII, he joined his father-in-law who was recruited by the Japanese to cut the trail to prepare for the marches.

He told his story to Daily Express in 2016, “One time my fellow track cutter stopped for a cigarette and was hit on the head with a rod.”

Tuaty also shared how he saw weak prisoners passing by and tried to offered rice to them but was scolded by the guards.

Thanks to Tuaty, a long time dispute between two historians – Silver and Dr Kevin Silver – was finally solved.

Dr Smith argued that the track head to Miruru via the Liwagu Valley while Silver claimed that it never went to Miruru. Tuaty then confirmed Silver’s evidence that the trail never head to Miruru.

Another witness of the march, Zudin (who died in 2017) also confirmed that the trail never passed Miruru.

Kundasang War Memorial 6
An inscription found at Kundasang War Memorial.

3.Operation Kingfisher is the rescue plan that never took place

The saddest part of the marches was the fact there was a planned rescue operation.

Unfortunately, the mission (called Operation Kingfisher) never took off the planning desk.

There are several alleged reasons why the Allied forces did not execute Operation Kingfisher.

It was reported that Agas reconnaissance missions incorrectly reported that there were no prisoners left in the Sandakan camp.

Another factor said that there was no adequate air support.

Nonetheless, if only Operation Kingfishers was not abandoned, perhaps many men could have returned to their families.

Kundasang War Memorial 5
The Australian Garden At Kundasang War Memorial.

4.Japanese soldiers reportedly turned to cannibalism

The Japanese soldiers themselves had their own suffering in Sabah during the war.

Dick Braithwaite and Yun Lok Lee wrote in their paper Dark Tourism, Hate and Reconciliation: The Sandakan Experience, “Many Japanese soldiers also perished of starvation and disease in the jungle. In the latter half of the Pacific War, Japanese Troops were chronically under-supplied. In order to preserve their fighting effectiveness under such conditions, individual soldiers who were no longer effective were given a day’s rations and cast out of their military unit and told to fend for themselves. Many turned to cannibalism.”

Kundasang War Memorial 7
Some of the newspaper clippings at the memorial.

5.Those who were killed even after the Japanese had surrendered

By the end of July 1945, there were about 38 prisoners (some report stated 33) left alive at Ranau.

Weak and sick, they were unable to do any work. They were then killed by the guards, sadly perhaps up to 12 days after the Japanese officially surrendered on Aug 15. By killing the remaining prisoners, the Japanese wanted to get rid all possible witnesses of the marches.

As for the remaining POWs at Sandakan camp, the last man alive – John Skinner was beheaded on Aug 15 at 7.15am.

Five hours later, Emperor Hirohito announced that Japan had unconditionally surrendered.

These POWs clearly did not have the same fate with the prisoners at Batu Lintang Camp in Kuching.

After the war, there were two ‘death orders’ found among the official Japanese papers at the camp.

The first order was scheduled on Aug 17 or 18 but for unknown reason was not executed. The second order was scheduled to take place on Sept 15. Thankfully, the camp was liberated on Sept 11 by the Australian 9th Division.

The timely liberation of the camp may have saved the lives of over 2,000 men, women and children at Batu Lintang Camp.

6.The White-Japanese, the ‘betrayer’ among the Australians?

Among the six survivors of the Sandakan Death Marches, there was one Australian soldiers regarded as ‘White Jap’ by his fellow survivors. He was Warrant Officer William Hector Sticpewich.

Silver wrote in her website that he was very much hated by his fellow survivors, “So much so that, post-war, they refused to have anything to do with him.

“There have always been question marks over Sticpewich’s behaviour. Described as ‘a Jack of all trades’, as soon as he reached Sandakan he made himself indispensable to the Japanese and, therefore, avoided labour on the airstrip.

“By his own admission, he went to the airstrip on one occasion only – in late 1942 when all POWs, including the sick and officers, were put to work to ensure the first stage of construction was finished in time for a grand opening.”

Unlike other survivors who looked emaciated after their rescue, Sticpewich was reportedly in fantastic condition.

Additionally, Sticpewich was suspected to have killed another soldier Private Herman ‘Alby’ Reither when they both escaped from Ranau on July 28, 1945.

In response to Silver’s investigation, Avtar Singh wrote in the Daily Express that finding fault for war veterans and then going after them in public had to stop.

He opined, “They had suffered enough both during and after the war. And let’s remember, nobody profits from these allegations and these stories.”

7.Tracking the bodies of POWs

Kundasang War Memorial 8
A couple walking through the Contemplation Garden of the Kundasang War Memorial where the panels name all the victims.

After the war ended, the difficult part of searching the remains of more than 1,000 soldiers scattered along the 250 kilometres of jungle trekking began.

One of the soldiers tasked for the job was Stan Roberts. He was a member of 8 Australian War Graves unit. Roberts was deployed to North Borneo in June 1946 to locate the remains and transferring them.

Once the remains were exhumed, they were wrapped in lengths of hessian and carried back to Ranau. There, Roberts searched for any clues to identify the remain.

Since all the army identity discs had rotted, being made from compressed cardboard, there was little to help identify the remains.

A number of those died on the Sandakan Death Marches were given their final resting place at Labuan War Cemetery. Those who could not be identified were reburied as ‘Known unto God’.

Sandakan Death Marches 2
The remains of men who died or were killed in the ruins of the Sandakan camp were identified by members of war graves units sifting through hundreds of named personal items. Credits: Australian War Memorial.

8.Why the Japanese did what they did

Yuki Tanaka in Hidden Horrors: Japanese Crimes in World War II gave his insight on why the Japanese soldiers committed such horrendous crimes against the POWs.

“The ill-treatment and massacres of POWs at Sandakan and the Sandakan Death Marches were made possible in large part by the traditional Japanese military ideology and the training procedures that arose from it. Men were trained to follow orders habitually and unquestioningly, and the training evidently worked. Captain Yamamoto Shoichi and Captain Takakuwa Takuo apparently never questioned the orders they were given by their superiors. Their primary concern was how they could carry out their orders, and this thinking led them to commit war crimes. It is insufficient to attribute responsibility to these individuals, however, without placing their behaviour within the context of Japanese military ideology,” he wrote.

Yuki further explained, “Dehumanisation involves a psychological distancing process whereby it becomes possible to act aggressively toward a weaker person without feeling the remorse that would occur in more normal circumstances. When dehumanisation of the enemy reaches its extremes, normally unthinkable acts such as the massacre of POWs become possible. In the situation at Sandakan, the Japanese believed they were under such threat from an Allied Invasion that there was no hope for them; they were destined to dehumanise prisoners and act brutally toward them,

“At Sandakan the enemy bodies that could be counted were those of dead prisoners rather than enemy combatants, but the officers at Sandakan shared the same malignant obsession with counting the dead. The Japanese, partly out of the overwhelming anxiety that they were about to meet their own deaths, felt driven to kill prisoners and then, perversely, were able to use the numbers of dead to reduce their anxiety.”

9.War trials against the Japanese soldiers

Regardless of the reasons, what the Japanese soldiers committed during Sandakan Death Marches undeniably were war crimes.

Sticpewich might be considered a betrayer to some but he was one of the witnesses along with Botterill, Short and Campbell during the war crimes trials in Tokyo and Rabaul.

During the occupation, the Sandakan camp was led by Lieutenant Susumi Hoshijima.

Since he was a military engineer, he was in-charge of building the military airstrip. Hoshijima was promoted to Captain toward the end of the war.

He reportedly told the POWs, “You will work until your bones rot under the tropical sun of Borneo. You will work for the Emperor. If any of you escape, I will pick out three or four and shoot them. The war will last for 100 years.”

Captain Susumi Hoshijima AWM 133913
Captain Susumi Hoshijima (centre) during the war crimes trial in Labuan. Credit: Australian War Memorial.

In May 1945, Captain Takakuwa Takuo was put in-charge of the POWs.

Too bad for Captain Hoshijima, the war did not last for 100 years. He was found guilty for war crimes and hanged on Apr 6, 1946.

Meanwhile, Captain Takakuwa and his second-in-charge Watanabe Genzo were found guilty of causing the murders of POWs and were hanged and shot on Apr 6, 1946 and Mar 16, 1946 respectively.

As for Lieutenant-general Masao Baba, he was charged with command responsibility for the Sandakan Death Marches. The commander forces in northern Borneo was found guilty and hanged on Aug 7, 1947.

Masao Baba
News headline reporting on the trial of Lieutenant-General Masao Baba.

10.The Suicide of Colonel Suga

The person who was responsible of all POWs and civilian internment camps in Borneo during WWII actually was Lieutenant-Colonel Tatsuji Suga.

He was an English lecturer before the war and volunteered as prison camp commander after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour.

In Borneo, there were mainly three interment camps; Batu Lintang (Kuching), Kota Kinabalu and Sandakan. Besides these, there was a brief internment camp on Labuan island.

Suga was based at Batu Lintang and practically absent at other camps.

Batu Lintang Camp FOSM
Flying over the prisoner of war camp (POW) in Batu Lintang at a low height, RAAF Beaufighter pilots reported sighting white POWs, clad in khaki shorts, who excitedly waved as the RAAF aircraft flew over to drop leaflets announcing Japan’s surrender. Credits: Public Domain (Copyright expired). https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C242106

Unlike other Japanese soldiers such as Hoshijima, Suga was remembered by some internees to be kind.

One Australian civilian internee Rosemary Beatty recalled that Suga would take the children to his residence and served them coffee and fruits. Sometimes he even gave the children sweets.

Whenever Suga was away from Batu Lintang camp, the brutality by the guards increased. It is unknown if it is due to Suga’s instruction or his men took advantage to abuse the prisoners during his absence.

Believed to be a Catholic, he attended masses at the camp during the war. Once, he even rewarded the elderly priests with some papayas. Little did he know, the papayas were obtained by his men from the priests’ own garden.

On Aug 24, Suga himself officially announced to the prisoners at Batu Lintang that Japan had surrendered.

He was heartbroken as he believed that his entire family had been killed in the bombing of Hiroshima.

When the Japanese officially surrendered in Kuching on board HMAS Kapunda on Sept 11, 1945, he was there to attend. Later that day, Suga officially surrendered himself at Batu Lintang Camp.

Together with several of his officers, he was flown to Labuan to await for their trials as war criminals.

According to the website Digger History, Suga was found dead in the morning of Sept 16, 1945. He reportedly committed suicide by stabbing his throat with a table knife. He was also found with a water bottle half-filled with sand. While some reports suggested he struck his own head using the bottle before stabbing himself, other stated that he had help in his suicide.

Did Suga disobey the first death order to execute all Batu Lintang’s prisoners? We might never know.

And did he die with the knowledge of atrocities committed at the Sandakan Death Marches and camp? We also might never know.

One thing for sure, Suga died without knowing that his wife and three of his children had in fact survived the Hiroshima bombing.

The mystery behind eight missing priests in Sabah during WWII

One of the worst things when it comes to the atrocities of war is not knowing the fate of your loved ones who went missing.

When people went missing during wartime, it became logical to presume they were dead.

However, without physical evidence, one may never know the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

When Borneo was under Japanese occupation during World War II, all European soldiers and civilians were taken as prisoners of war (POWs). These civilians included missionary priests and nuns who came to the island to spread Christianity and established schools.

In Sarawak, most of the priests and nuns were taken to the Batu Lintang POW camp. One Mill Hill priest who was the parish priest of Marudi went along with other British officers to go to Long Nawang, Kalimantan to seek refuge. There, he was executed with more than 40 people by the Japanese.

In North Borneo, however, a small group of priests and their companions went missing, their bodies never found, even after the war.

It is understood that they were killed but how? And when?

Who were the missing priests?

The oldest of the missing priests is Monsignor August Wachter, who was also the Prefect of Northern Borneo at that time.

Born in Bludenz in Austria on Dec 7, 1878, Wachter was ordained as a priest on Dec 6, 1903. He came to Borneo in September, 1905, first arriving in Kuching and serving in Mount Singai. He also founded the St Michael Catholic Church Penampang and the Congregation of the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Conception.

Reverend Joseph Bӧhm was born on Feb 20, 1900 in the diocese of Prague. He was ordained priest at the age of 27 and immediately sent to Borneo.

Meanwhile, Reverend Joseph Theurl was born on April 24, 1907 in Innsbruck, the fifth-largest city in Austria. Just like Bohm, he was sent to Borneo after his ordination on July 8, 1934.

The fourth of the missing priests was Reverend John Unterberger. He came to Borneo two days after his ordination on Sept 21, 1907. Unterberger was also the Pro-Prefect during the absence of Monsignor Wachter.

Reverend Mark Obertegger was born on April 18, 1905 at Meran. He came to North Borneo in 1930. The sixth missing priest is Reverend Anthony Raich. He was ordained during the First World War but he only joined the Mill Hill Society in 1923. Raich left for Borneo a year later in 1924.

The seventh priest in the group was Reverend Francis Flűr. Born on Jan 29, 1906, he was ordained on July 14, 1905 and then sent to Borneo.

Little is known about the eighth member of the group except that his name was Bro. Aegidius Leiter. He was a close companion of Monsignor Wachter.

Along with these eight religious men, there were three young local men who went missing with them. They were Patrick Lee, Peter Wong and Stanislaus Sabahai.

A fragment of a Roman collar that could have belonged to one of the missing priests

According to Union Catholic Asian News, British and Dutch missioners were detained in Batu Lintang POW Camp soon after the Japanese occupied Borneo in early 1942.

The report stated, “German missioners’ movements were restricted, except for Monsignor Wachter, who was free to visit Catholic communities. When Germany surrendered, the Japanese military no longer trusted the German missioners. Detained in May 1945, they were herded from place to place until they arrived in Tenom, the North Borneo Japanese military headquarters deep in the interior of Sabah, where one priest died of malaria in June. The other missioners were last reportedly seen alive in early August in Tenom, a piece of Roman collar found on the Sapong rubber estate near Tenom led to the belief they were killed there, but their bodies were never found.”

Located on the Tenom Lama-Kemabong road, Sapong was a rubber and tobacco estate established in 1905.

During the Japanese occupation, the estate became the 37th Japanese Army Headquarters in early 1944 to avoid being targeted by the Allies forces.

Were the missing priests shot to death?

An unnamed author wrote a historical account of what happen during the Japanese invasion of North Borneo which was published in The Daily Express on Nov 8, 2014.

In an article entitled ‘Looking back: North Borneo war scars’, the author gave his part of the story on might have happened to the eight missing priests.

He stated, “I have a sad and frightening story to tell. Monsignor A. Wachter, who was the Head of the Prefecture Apostolic of North Borneo and a few other priests of German nationals were later interned by the Japanese and were brought to Tenom from Penampang after the fall of Germany in 1945.

“Monsignor Wachter and the other priests, while being interned in Tenom, tried to contact us (my two brothers, Henry Edward, Jack Harry Maurice and myself) but they were refused permission by the Japanese to see us. We only learnt after the war, they were brought to Tenom from Penampang.

“Had we known they were in Tenom, we would have done something to rescue them from the Japanese. It was indeed sad to hear that Monsignor Wachter and the other priests were believed shot and killed by the Japanese.

“After the war, while I was serving in the District Office, Tenom, I tried my level best to locate the grave or graves of the late Monsignor Wachter and the other priests but to no avail.”

Fatt Choi 4
A view of Tenom town.

The missing priests could not have been killed by the Japanese because they spoke German?

However, another famous theory about what happened to the eight missing priests is that they were not killed by the Japanese in the first place.

As per reported in the Union Catholic Asian News, the Austrian priests at first were not interned by the Japanese because they knew how to speak German.

During WWII, the fight was between two major groups of nations which became known as the Axis Powers and the Allied Powers. The Allied forces were the countries that fought against the Axis powers. Meanwhile, the Axis Powers is an alliance between Germany, Japan and Italy.

It was believed that the Japanese did not interned the Austrian priests due to their alliance with the German.

If it is true, why did the Japanese capture and subsequently move them from Penampang to Tenom in May 1945?

The widely reported theory is that since Germany surrendered unconditionally to the Allies on May 7, 1945, the Japanese could no longer believe the German-speaking Austrian priests.

Another theory is that after the failed resistance led by Albert Kwok and his Kinabalu Guerrillas, the Japanese started to turn aggressive toward the Catholic missionaries.

Putting aside what might be the reason behind the Japanese’ change of heart toward the priests, there is one thing for sure. The eight missing priests were moved from Penampang to Tenom in May 1945.

The answer could be in ‘A Glimpse of a Mystery’

In searching for the truth behind the mystery of missing priests, the answer could lie in the book ‘A Glimpse of a Mystery’.

Written by Fr Charles Chiew in 2012, the book explored all the possibilities of what could have happened to the priests.

He believed that the shooting of the priests by the Japanese was just based on rumour and hearsay.

In the end, Chiew concluded “without hesitation submit that the eight Austrian Mill Hill Missionaries, their companions and the Japanese soldiers and officers of the Judiciary Department perished at Sapong during the Allies Airstrike sometime between July 1 and August 15, 1945 (most likely on July 3, 1945).”

According to Chiew, there was no reason for the Japanese to kill the priests and they were in fact, brought to Tenom for their safety.

Even so, the airstrike caused the building of Judiciary Department and its occupants to be completely annihilated.

How did the Allies forces find out about the location of 37th Japanese Army Headquarters?

Operation Semut was a series of reconnaissance operations carried by Australia’s Z Special Unit during WWII. By June 1945, Operation Semut 1 successfully spread its armed forces thinly in entire northern Sarawak even as far as Tenom.

On top of that, they successfully gathered intelligence regarding Japanese positions in these areas.

The Allies forces then were able to launch precisely their attacks on Japanese strongholds including the Sapong estate, dropping bombs on it without knowing that there could be civilians inside these buildings.

At the end of the day, however, the mystery behind the eight missing priests could only be answered by theories.

Was it possible they were shot by the Japanese and then their graves were annihilated during the Allies airstrike? Maybe. Or what had Chiew proposed was true in the first place that they were all well and alive until the bombing? We might never a hundred per cent sure.

In remembrance of the eight missing priests, a cenotaph was erected to commemorate them at the Church of St. Anthony, Tenom.

Here are the photos of the cenotaph taken by KajoMag in August, 2018.

The mystery behind eight missing priests in Sabah during WWII 2
The mystery behind eight missing priests in Sabah during WWII 3
The mystery behind eight missing priests in Sabah during WWII 1

Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner, founder of Sacred Heart School Sibu

Sacred Heart School Sibu is perhaps one of the oldest schools in the state.

It was founded in 1902 by Reverend Aloysius Hopfgartner.

Who was Rev Hopfgartner and how much time did he spend here in Sarawak?

Aloysius Hopfgartner 2
Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner in an undated photo.

Here are 10 things you should know about Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner in remembrance of the founder of Sacred Heart School, Sibu:

1.Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner’s missionary life in Borneo

Born in Muhlwald, Taufers, in the South Tyrol, Italy on Jan, 1874, he was ordained as a priest at the Saint Joseph’s Missionary Society for Foreign Mission or better known as the Mill Hill Missionaries in 1901.

He came to Sarawak in August of the same year and was posted to Sarikei immediately.

A year later, he was posted to Sibu where he founded the Sacred Heart School.

For the next few years, he worked closely with the Ibans in Sibu division.

In 1911, Hopfgartner was transferred to Sandakan until his return to Kuching in 1916. Since then, he remained most of the time in Kuching. He was also the principal of St. Joseph School from 1931 till 1934.

In November 1935, Hopfgartner succeeded Monsignor Edmondo Dunn as the Apostolic Prefects of Sarawak following Dunn’s death.

2.The history of Sacred Heart School, Sibu

According to the school’s website, Hopfgartner built a small ‘atap’ shed as an English school on the present Government Concrete Wharf located.

Three years later, the school moved to Lanang Road. Instead of an attap hut, the building consisted of two storeys.

The ground floor worked as the class while the first floor served as a dormitory for the boarders.

During the early days of the school, there were no school uniforms. Most of the students reportedly wore clogs to school back then.

The teachers taught the students English comprising Grammar, Composition and Dictation along with arithmetic, Malay and Religious Knowledge. Meanwhile, students who wanted to learn Chinese needed to attend extra afternoon classes.

The school session lasted from morning to evening. The morning classes started from 8am till 11am while the afternoon classes were from 1.30pm to 4pm.

As for recreational activities, the students only had the luxury to play football. They also needed to go through a session of manual labour where they collected firewood and cut grass.

By 1907, the school was relocated to Mission Road. Built over marshy land alongside the Rajang river, the water usually seeped through the school’s floorboards during floods or high tides.

3.He was the first known European to be fluent in Hakka in Sarawak

During his service in Sarawak, Hopfgartner learned how to speak the local languages including Hakka.

Reportedly, he was so fluent in Hakka, a Chinese dialect that he could give his homilies in that language.

4.Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner helped in the foundation of Sisters of St Francis of Sarawak.

Dunne was inspired to start a localised women’s religious order in the Catholic Church of Sarawak.

He wanted them to follow the rule of the Third Order of St Francis of Assisi. Dunne then asked Hopfgartner to compose a book of rules for the nuns.

He first studied the statutes of St Ann’s native nuns of Madras Archdiocese which also belonged to the Third Order of St Francis. He made the rules as closely as possible to theirs but with minor modifications.

Finally on July 26, 1928, Dunne formally issued the decree of establishment of what is now known as the Little Sisters of St Francis of Sarawak.

The nuns are vowed to live in simplicity and humility after the example of St Francis of Assisi. They work mostly serving the poor and the youths.

5.Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner set the stone of the St. Peter Padungan church, Kuching.

In 1937, Hopfgartner bought seven acres of swampland at the Padungan area. He also rented a house near it to start a school and a new parish.

Then in 1940, a new school and a convent were built next to new parish. During World War II, the Japanese took over the school and convent to be used as a centre for war casualties and internment of European civilians.

Hopfgartner planned and started to build the church in 1949. St. Peter Padungan church was finally completed on Dec 18, 1949.

However, Hopfgartner was not alive to see its completion.

6.Life during Japanese Occupation

During the Japanese occupation, he was confined with one other priest to his own house.

They were always under the watchful eyes of the Japanese, at any moment likely to be singled out for their particular attention.

While Hopfgartner survived the ordeal under Japanese rule, his health declined tremendously after the war.

7.He was one of the last recipients of Order of the Star of Sarawak

The third White Rajah Vyner Brooke established The Most Excellent Order of the Star of Sarawak on Sept 26, 1928.

It is the highest order of chivalry within the Kingdom of Sarawak.

The motto of the order was “Haraplah Sa-lagi Bernafas”, which was also the kingdom’s motto. It is the translation of the Latin phrase Dum Spiro Spero which literally means “As long as I breathe, I hope.”

The award was to recognise exceptional service by the Sarawak subjects and foreigners alike to the state of Sarawak.

It was last rewarded in 1946 making Hopfgartner, who received it on June 20, 1946, among the last recipients of the award.

8. Rev Aloysius Hopfgartner collapsed at the current site of St Peter Church Padungan and never woke up again.

According to the unnamed writer of his obituary, he met the priest in February 1949 and commented on his ‘frail appearance’.

Known as Hoppy to those who were close to him, the writer wrote, “Hoppy’s only comment was that he was weakening and the end was approaching. He had no regrets or fears, and he accepted the inevitable in that true priestly spirit in which he lived his life.”

Toward the end of April that year, he made his routine trip to Bau, walking for miles on foot during his visit.

He then returned to Kuching feeling ill. Yet, Fr Hopfgartner went out again to inspect the church building in Padungan.

Unfortunately, he suffered a stroke during his visit and reportedly remained in semi-consciousness for the next 19 days.

Fr Hopfgartner passed away peacefully on May 15, 1949. He was 75.

In Sacred Heart School, there is a clock tower and bronze plaque erected in Hopfgartner’s memory.

Frank Marryat, the man who gave us the early drawings of Borneo

There were many adventurers who came to Borneo during the 19th century.

While most of them jotted down their experiences in writing, only a few talented ones managed to capture it in drawings.

One of them was Frank Marryat (1826-1855), an English sailor, author and artist. His father, Captain Frederick Marryat was a Royal Navy officer and a novelist.

Captain Marryat is widely known today as an early pioneer of the sea story.

Life of Frank Marryat

Following in his father’s footsteps, Marryat joined the Royal Navy at the young age of 14.

During Marryat’s service on board of HMS Samarang, he drew the places he visited and the people he met.

At first, he planned to publish his drawings without any writing. Eventually, he added some text of his own and from his colleagues’ journals, publishing his first book in 1848.

The book was entitled Borneo and the Indian Archipelago. In the book, Marryat described his life as a sailor from witnessing a piece of history such as the Treaty of Labuan and collecting turtle’s eggs at Talang-talang islands.

Here are some of his notable drawings of Borneo and Marryatt’s description of it:

Kuching
Frank Marryat 1
“The town of Kuchin is built on the left-hand side of the river Sarawak going up; and, from the windings of the river, you have to pull twenty-five miles up the river to arrive at it, whereas it is only five miles from the coast as the crow flies. It consists of about 800 houses, built on piles driven into the ground, the sides and roofs being enclosed with dried palm leaves. Strips of bamboo are laid across, which serve as a floor.” (Frank Marryat, 1848)
James Brooke’s house
Frank Marryat 2
“The residence of Mr. Brooke is on the side of the river opposite to the town, as, for the most part, are all the houses of the Europeans. In structure it somewhat resembles a Swiss cottage, and is erected upon a green mound, which slopes down to the river’s bank, where there is a landing-place for boats. At the back of the house is a garden, containing almost every tree peculiar to the climate; and it was a novelty to us to see collected together the cotton-tree, the areca, sago, palm, &c., with every variety of the Camellia japonica in a state of most luxurious wildness.” (Frank Marryat,1848)
Mount Kinabalu
Frank Maryatt 4
Borneo has but small elevation for so large an island; in the immediate vicinity of Keeney Ballu the country is hilly, but by far the greatest portion of Borneo is but a few feet above the level of the sea. Keeney Ballu is the highest mountain in the island,—its height is estimated at 14,000 feet or more,—and it can be seen at 150 miles distant on a very clear day. It is very singular that there should be a mountain of so great a height rising from an island of otherwise low land. (Frank Marryat, 1848)

Frank Marryat’s Life After Borneo

He returned to England after his adventure in Borneo then proceeded to California in 1850.

Then in 1853, Marryat returned to England and got married. In the same year, he wanted to return to California with his new wife.

Unfortunately, he had contracted yellow fever on board ship.

This forced him to cut the trip short and return to England.

He died shortly before his book Mountains and Molehills or Memoirs of a Burnt Journal (1855). Marryat was just 29 years old.

The notice of Frank Marryat’s death

An unnamed writer wrote Marryat’s obituary and it was published in Life and Letters of Captain Marryatt (1872), a book about his father. The notice summarised his life perfectly.

“It is with the most sincere regret that we announce of the decease Mr Marryat, author of ‘Borneo and the Eastern Archipelago’ and of ‘Mountains and Molehills’, the latter of a work published at the commencement of this year, which has been most favourably received by the reading public.

Mr Marryat died at his residence, Mercer Lodge, Kensington on Thursday, the 12th instant, at noon, after a severe illness of more than six months’ duration.

He was the fourth son of the late Captain Marryat, the eminent novelist, and was born on the 3rd of April, 1826.

Like his elder brother he early displayed an invincible longing for the sea, and was consequently entered a midshipman at the age of fourteen.

Previously to this, he had received as large education as possible- first at Paris, afterwards in a school at Wimbledon.

Happily, in these days, the young midshipman’s education is still carried on, even in matters not strictly professional, and this was the case with young Marryat on board the Vanguard, Captain Sir David Dunn.

In the Vanguard he cruised principally in the Mediterranean, and was afterwards entered in the Samarang, Captain Sir Edward Belcher, ordered on a surveying expedition in the Indian Archipelago.

In his work on Borneo, Mr Marryat has given a very agreeable and instructive account of his four years’ cruise in the Samarang, 1843-1847.

On his return home, he resided for some time at Langham, in Norfolk, with his father, who lost his eldest son in the Avenger.

Captain Marryatt himself died in August, 1848 and his son, by no means tried of a roving life, now resolved to seek fresh adventures.

The field he chose was California, with reference to which he penned his work ‘Mountains and Molehills’, to our mind one of the most delightful books of travel ever written.

He was described as “his manners were most agreeable, and his conversation showed that delicate kind of humour as well as keen observation of mankind.”

Thanks to Marryat’s observation, we roughly have a glimpse of how Borneo looked like in the 1840s.

You can read Borneo and the Indian Archipelago online for free thanks to The Project Gutenberg.

The trial of Japanese general Masao Baba for the Sandakan Death Marches

The Borneo Campaign of 1945 was the last major Allied campaign in the South West Pacific Area during World War II (WWII) to liberate Japanese-held British Borneo and Dutch Borneo.

The Allied forces called it Operation Oboe and it was a series of amphibious assaults between May 1 and July 21.

On the Allied forces’ side, the Australian I Corps under Lieutenant-General Leslie Morshead conducted the assault. Meanwhile, the Imperial Japanese forces had Vice-Admiral Michiaki Kamada leading the naval garrison and the 37th Army under Lieutenant-General Masao Baba guarding the island.

Initially, the campaign was planned to involve six stages of landing. Eventually, the landings took place in four; Tarakan, Labuan, Balikpapan and North Borneo (Sabah).

During the campaign, Baba organised anti-guerrilla operations in the interior of Borneo island as an act retaliation against the Allied forces. After a series of attacks, the campaign and the war were finally put to an end after the Japanese surrendered.

On Aug 15, 1945, Japanese Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Imperial Japan. He formally signed it on Sept 2 bringing WWII to an end.

Later on, all Japanese forces were instructed to surrender, including Baba.

He turned over his sword to Major General George Wooten of the Australian 9th Division as a sign of surrender on Sept 10, 1945 in Labuan.

The place where Baba surrendered in Labuan near Layang-layang beach is now fittingly known as Surrender Point.

Australian troops land from USS LST 560 at Labuan on 10 June 1945
Australian troops land from USS LST-560, at Labuan Island in Brunei Bay, 10 June 1945. Credits: Public Domain

The aftermath of Borneo Campaign 1945

After North Borneo was liberated from Japanese forces, the war crimes that took place during the war began to be unveiled.

The most heinous war crime which happened in Sabah during WWII was none other than the Sandakan Death Marches. These were a series of forced marches in Borneo from Sandakan to Ranau.

It resulted in the deaths of 2,434 Allied Prisoners of War (POWs). By the end of the war, of all prisoners who had been incarcerated at Sandakan and Ranau, only six Australians survived.

It is widely considered to be the single worst atrocity suffered by Australian servicemen during WWII.

After the war, Baba was officially discharged from the Imperial Japanese Army in April 1946.

As the head of Japanese forces in Borneo toward the end of the war, Baba was suspected of being involved in Sandakan Death Marches.

Japanese Surrender Labuan OG3495
Lieutenant-General Masao Baba (centre), at Labuan airstrip on his way to sign the official surrender document on Sept 10, 1945. Credit: Public Domain.

The trial against Masao Baba

Afterward, Baba was arrested in January 1947 and brought to Rabaul, Territory of New Guinea for trial under the charge with command responsibility for the Sandakan Death Marches.

During the war trial which began on May 28, 1947, the official charges against Baba were “while commander of armed forces of Japan… unlawfully disregarded and failed to discharge his duty as a commander to control the conduct of the members of his command whereby they committed brutal atrocities and other high crimes.”

Even though the first order for the march (which took place in January 1945) had been given before Baba took over the command of the 37th Army, he admitted that he was fully aware of the condition of the POWS.

He even ordered a reconnaissance of the jungle route which the prisoners were to travel.

However, Baba failed to alter the orders for the march after this reconnaissance.

The court report stated, “The accused received a report of this march early in 1945, in spite of which report he ordered the evacuation of the remaining 540 prisoners over the same route in May, 1945.

“This second march proved even more disastrous than the first. Only 183 prisoners reached Ranau and of these another 150 died there shortly after their arrival.”

Unfortunately by the end of July, only 33 of the POWs survived. Then, the worst thing happened. The officers-in-charge executed the remaining 33 prisoners on Aug 1, 1945.

Basically, he was accused of not preventing the Sandakan Death Marches from happening and failed to control his subordinates from killing the remaining 33 POWs.

Masao Baba’s defense

Awm 120461 sandakan
October 24, 1945. Sandakan prisoner of war camp, Sandakan, North Borneo. A few months after it was vacated and demolished by retreating Japanese troops, little remains of the burnt-out camp. In an area of No. 1 compound (pictured) the bodies of 300 prisoners of war were discovered. They were believed to have been those men left in the camp after the Sandakan death marches to Ranau. Each grave contained several bodies, in some cases as many as 10. Australian and British personnel were murdered and buried here. Australian War Memorial ID Number: 120461 Photographer: Burke, Frank Albert Charles.Credits: Public Domain.

Baba pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. With regard to the marches, Baba pleaded that the evacuation of the POWs camp at Sandakan to Ranau was of operational necessity.

As the camp was near the seashore, hence an allied landing was to be anticipated. In fact, the Allied troops did land there a few months too late. They landed in July 1945 after the camp had been evacuated.

Additionally, Baba during the trial defended that the Japanese army were themselves short of food and medical supplies. Furthermore, many of the guards also died during the marches.

The trial record also stated, “The accused gave evidence of the measure he had taken to secure provisions and medical supplies for the second march and said that he had done his best to provide for the prisoners.

“With regard to the killing of the 33 survivors at Ranau on 1st Aug, he claimed that by that time Ranau was cut off from his headquarters as a result of the allied landings and that he, therefore, could no longer exercise any effective control over the officers there who had previously been under his command.”

On top of that, Baba gave evidence that he did not hear of the murders until after the cessation of hostilities. This fact was proven to be true and the order to kill the remaining 33 POWs did not come from Baba.

The verdict on Masao Baba

Meanwhile, prosecutor Major Dick pointed out that under international law that a commander of armed forces at war has a duty to control the conduct of the members of his command.

He continued, “And that if he deliberately, of through culpable negligence, fails to discharge that duty, and as a result of such failure members of his command commit war crimes, he is guilty of a violation of the laws and usages of war.”

Summing up the trial, the judge said, “It can be argued that the killings were the result of the marches. Indeed, they could not have occurred without the movement of the prisoners but they were not, I feel, a natural result of these marches. It is, therefore, the court to consider whether they were due to failure of the accused in his duties as a commander.”

Eventually, according to the Sydney Morning Herald on June 6, 1947, the court reached its verdict of guilty after deliberation of 12 minutes. The sentence on Baba was announced after a recess of only two minutes.

Baba was sentenced to death and eventually executed by hanging on Aug 7, 1947 in Rabaul.

Masao Baba
The Argus reporting on the trial of Lieutenant-General Masao Baba.

Masao Baba failing to protect his own soldiers

Looking back at Baba’s military career with the Japanese Army during WWII, he first commanded 53rd Division in Sumatra, Indonesia. He held the post until Sept 25, 1943 when he was appointed commander of the 4th Division also in Sumatra.

He was then transferred to Dec 26, 1944 to Borneo, only less than a year before the war came to an end.

Being unfamiliar to his new working environment, did Baba underestimate the treacherous jungle path of Borneo that he continued with the order of his predecessor? Maybe he thought the 265 kilometres from Sandakan to Ranau was through a flat, thin jungle? Furthermore, is it because he was transferred to a new unit that he failed to control his subordinates?

Regardless, his decision not to cancel the first march and to order the second march resulted in the deaths of not only POWs.

Dick Braithwaite and Lee Yun Lok pointed in a paper called Dark Tourism, Hate and Reconciliation: The Sandakan Experience that many Japanese soldiers died during the marches.

They wrote, “The relocation of military units from one side of Borneo to the other, such as on the death march route, was something that generated much resentment among the Japanese soldiers. This resentment was no doubt taken out on others, including POWs and local people. The remains of Japanese suicides were found hanging in the jungle for many years after the war.”

The casualties number of 2,434 during the Sandakan Death Marches only covered the POWs. Today, we may never know the exact number of Japanese soldiers who died during the marches.

In the end of WWII, of the 25,000 Japanese soldiers based in Sabah, very few returned to Japan.

While the Australian Military Court sentenced Baba to death for failing to protect POWs, he as the commanding officer undeniably failed to protect his own men.

James Brooke’s role in the Battle of Marudu Bay 1845

“The Battle of Marudu Bay sees James Brooke enlisting the help of the British Royal Navy in Singapore to defeat Sherif Osman, a pirate leader from North Borneo, effectively ending his piracy,” this is what you will find on the Sarawak goverment’s official website of what happened in 1845.

But is there more to the story than the first White Rajah defeating a group of pirates?

Marudu Bay is located at the northern tip of Borneo where, in the 1840s, it was led by a man named by Syarif Usman (sometimes spelled as Sherif Osman).

According to Clifford Sather, Marudu Bay in particular, in the early 1800s served as a major staging point for slave-raiding operations.

“By the 1820s, the presence of Bajau and Ilanun settlements in coastal Sabah effectively eliminated Brunei’s political and commercial hold over the region,” Sather wrote.

In the meantime, Illanun slave trading activities allegedly sponsored by the Sulu was causing a blow to Brunei’s maritime commerce. These pirates disrupted sea routes and cut Brunei’s connections with the vital Chinese junk trade.

For a short period in the beginning, the northern Borneo settlement, particularly those of the Tempasuk Bajau was strong enough to ignore Sulu’s hegemony.

However in the 1830s, the Sulu reasserted its influence by recognising the powerful chief Syarif Usman as its regional governor in Marudu.

Believed to be a charismatic and a brave leader among the locals, the Westerners on the other hand, had a different perception of Syarif Usman.

James Brooke’s role in Battle of Marudu Bay 1845

mw00805
James Brooke

Brooke at that time was seeking to consolidate his uncertain position in Borneo.

While he was already treated as the Rajah of Sarawak, Brooke was worried about his position with regards to Britain.

Steven Runciman in The White Rajah: A History of Sarawak from 1841 to 1946 wrote, “He wanted official support, some form of official rank and a guarantee that Britain would interest herself in Borneo.”

Brooke finally could sigh a relief in February 1845. At that time, Captain Charles Bethune arrived from London with a despatch appointing Brooke as Confidential Agent to Her Majesty in Borneo.

Runciman stated, “Bethum also brought a letter from the British Government to the Sultan of Brunei, expressing the intention of co-operating with him against the pirates.”

Brooke then accompanied Bethune to deliver this letter to Brunei to which the Sultan received the latter politely.

After his visit to Brunei, Brooke found out that Admiral Sir Thomas Cochrane commander of the Far East Fleet was at Malacca.

He hurried to see him. The admiral shared Brooke’s views about the pirates and promised to join him in expedition against Marudu Bay.

In order to strengthen his position in Borneo, Brooke’s alleged principle method was to campaign for the destruction of ‘pirate’ strongholds on the island including Marudu Bay.

How the Battle of Marudu Bay 1845 went down according to Captain Pascoe

Captain R.N. Pascoe who took part in the expedition to Marudu Bay 1845 recorded about the attack in his journal:

It was on the 18th of August 1845 that a British squadron, consisting of H.M.S. Agincourt, Vestal, Daedalus, Vaxen and the sloops Cruiser and Wolverine, under the command of Rear Admiral Sir Thomas Cochrane, anchored at the entrance of Marudu Bay, the expedition having for its object the destruction of a nest of pirates under a Serip Usman, an Illanun pirate chef.

The attacking force, which consisted of 530 seamen and marines, in 24 boats, of which nine were gunboats, took up station off the mouth of Tandik river, in the southeast corner of the Bay, at 3pm and at dawn next day proceeded up the river, the pinnace with guns leading. Two Malays from Sarawak accompanied the forces as guides.

About six miles from the entrance the advance was checked by a boom moored across the river by view of three batteries “about musket range from the boom;” the largest fort, mounting eight large pieces, stood on the right bank gaily decked with banners, stood at the junction of the river, which at this point divides into two branches, the third was a floating battery moored to the left bank.

A messenger “an Illanun from Mindanao in rich attire,” with a flag of truce came down to meet the force, with the request that the two senior Officers should proceed to the fort and negotiate, “but they were not thus to be trusted,” and a reply was sent back that unless Serip Usman (Syarif Osman) himself came down fire would at once be opened.

Immediately the messenger’s boat was clear of the boom, a galling fire was opened from the forts. Gibbard, mate of the Wolverine, fell mortally wounded, and a brisk fire was kept up from both sides.

The enemy’s guns being lad on the boom, caused fairly heavy loss amongst the attacking force, which was working hard to remove the obstacle. In about at hour an opening was effected; two cutters with marines instantly carried the three-gun battery, and the enemy, abandoning the forts, fled through the town in the rear and made for the jungle.

At 2pm the forts, towns, and enemy vessels being destroyed, the force reassembled to return to the ships, taking with them the hospital pinnace with the wounded. The casualties amounted to ten killed and fifteen wounded, three mortally. The number of the enemy slain is not computed, though it seems to have been very large, the carnage being described as frightful, and the destruction of the pirate’s stronghold was complete.”

The other side of the Battle of Marudu Bay’s story

Even so, not everyone believed that Syariff Osman was a pirate captain. Alternatively, the locals believed he was a leader who brought prosperity to Marudu Bay.

German author Bianca Maria Gerlich who wrote the book Marudu 1845 believed that not everything happened like in the Western records.

She told an audience during a talk on Syarif Osman in Kota Kinabalu in 2019 that James Brooke defamed Marudu as a pirate’s lair.

Moreover, Gerlich said that Brooke defamed Syarif Osman as a pirate chieftain.

Brooke did that to eliminate a possible rival for his influence over parts of Borneo, which were not yet occupied by other Western powers.

She stated, “Syarif Osman had not only built a strong, economically expanding and independent polity in Marudu Bay, but moreover was in contact with many important leader personalities of the region. His fair-reaching authority was considered too dangerous by James Brooke.”

Perhaps Colombian writer Nicolas Gomez Davila’s famous quote was right, “Truth is in history, but history is not the truth.”

With most records still written Syarif Osman as the pirates leader, the Battle of Marudu 1845 did not only destroy the town but also the memory of its development as a coastal state.

KajoMag readers, let us know in the comment box what do you think? Was Syarif Osman the leader of pirates? Was the Battle of Marudu Bay necessary>

#KajoAsks: UINAH Ginger Beer, the beer that won’t get you drunk

With just 1.1% alcohol content, UINAH Ginger Beer does not qualify as an alcoholic beverage, according to the Non-Alcoholic Beverages regulations 362 to 384, 386 and 386A under the Food Regulations 1985.

So, this beverage is the perfect drink to be enjoyed in copious amounts especially now when the weather’s slightly warmer.

‘Uinah’ is Sabahan slang for ‘wow’. UINAH Ginger Beer was first launched in 2018 at Jesselton Artisan Market in Sabah.

It is made from ginger from Tambunan valley in Sabah and its other key ingredients include filtered water, citrus lemon, sugar, probiotic yeast and carbonation.

This ginger beer does not contain artificial flavouring or chemicals and has probiotic properties – which means it is good for digestive system.

KajoMag got in touch with UINAH Ginger Beer as we are curious about this thirst-quenching product.

KajoMag: When and how did your interest in brewing ginger beer start?

Uinah Ginger Beer
UINAH Roselle Paradise (Picture source: UINAH Ginger Beer)

UINAH: Our founders, James Wong and Matthias Liew, are Sabahan boys with a love for quality craft beverages. A few years ago, they started brewing ginger beer as a hobby and found they had a knack for it; wherever they went, people loved it!

So, in 2018, they started UINAH Premium Craft Beverages, and we offer two products: UINAH Ginger Beer and UINAH Roselle Paradise.

KajoMag: Can you tell us what makes UINAH Ginger Beer different from other ginger beers?

DSC8007 2
The ginger is from Tambunan, Sabah (Picture source: Uinah Ginger Beer)

UINAH: Our flagship beverage, UINAH Ginger Beer, is unique because we use some of the spiciest gingers in the region found in Tambunan, Sabah. This gives our ginger beer a spicy zing with a Bornean twist that sets it apart from other brews.

KajoMag: For those who have never tasted it, how would you describe UINAH Ginger Beer?

Uinah Ginger Beer
Enjoy the beverage on a sunny hot day! (Picture source: Uinah Ginger Beer)

UINAH: Our ginger beer is spicily refreshing! With a crisp and cool finish, it’s not overly sweet and the tartness of lemon balances well with our ginger’s strong kick, making it a great choice for Borneo’s sunny days. What may surprise you, though, is that our ginger beer is also sought after on cold, rainy days because ginger warms the body.

 KajoMag: What was the most memorable comment you received when you first launched?

UINAH: James remembers a time back when we first began. We had run out of stock when he received a phone call from a lady who was in confinement after having delivered her child.

“Where’s my ginger beer? I need my ginger beer,” she was saying, because apparently our ginger beer had been keeping her body warm and she was relying on it. Of course, it is a tasty drink too. That opened our eyes to the fact that there were other markets we could reach out to, like mums in confinement!

KajoMag: What dishes or flavours would you recommend to pair with UINAH Ginger Beer?

happy06
The ginger beer can be paired with a variety of delicious food (Picture source: Uinah Ginger Beer)

UINAH: UINAH Ginger Beer pairs extremely well with what we call pusas in Sabah: finger foods such as barbecued chicken wings, fried dumplings, satay, roasted wild boar (sinalau bakas) and grilled fish (ikan bakar).

We’d recommend it with some of Sarawak’s favourite dishes such as ayam pansuh or tomato mee. Our Ginger Beer goes well with Asian flavours, so wok-fried noodles with all the finishings or a hearty curry would be yums. For a Western palate, we’d recommend pub grub like burgers and fries, crispy-skin fried chicken and good ol’ fish and chips.

KajoMag: Where can one find Uinah Ginger Beer?

UINAH: You can find UINAH Ginger Beer at most supermarkets as well as at select cafes, restaurants and hotels in Sabah. We’ve also expanded to West Malaysia, so you’ll be able to find us in Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, Penang or Malacca.

KajoMag: Will we get to see Uinah Ginger Beer in Sarawak?

UINAH: Yes, we’re definitely hoping to bring UINAH to Sarawak. We’ve got our eye on Kuching, Miri, Bintulu and Sibu in 2020, so stay on the lookout for both Ginger Beer and Roselle Paradise.

Fingers crossed, we’ll be hitting your shelves soon. And who knows, maybe one day we’ll even be available at your Rainforest World Music Festival!

#KajoAsks: Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu, the online cooking class for those who struggle in the kitchen

When it comes to cooking traditional dishes, for most millennials, the struggle is real.

From struggling to identify the right ingredients and cooking traditional dishes a certain way, when cooking in the kitchen, there seems to be a lot going on when preparing food.

But for Sabahan Pison Jaujip, it is his love for his homeland and traditional food that first got him started on his own online cooking channel, “Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu” on YouTube.

Ropuhan Di Tanah Wagu
(Image source: Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu)

Pison started posting traditional and exotic local dishes on his channel, “Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu” in 2016 as an homage to his homeland and traditional Sabahan food.

Ropuhan Di Tanah Wagu
(Image source: Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu)

“Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu” means “kitchen for young men” in the Kadazandusun language.

Among his recipes are ‘ikan liking lada putih’, ‘ayam goreng tuhau’ and durian petal with losun (local spring onion).

At times, some of his recipes incorporate traditional ingredients with well-known – if not western recipes – thus creating fusion recipes which perfectly blend unique elements of both Asian and Western ingredients.

Examples include Sabahan Sago Crepe with pisang Sabah and melted Chocolate and omelette.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CK36rIczTk

Apart from traditional Sabahan cuisine, Pison also his own delicious line of premium traditional jams (buga kantan jam, bambangan jam and tuhau jam) as well as non-alcoholic drinks (sparkling tarap, sparkling bunga kantan, sparkling tuhau and sparkling bambangan).

And since we at KajoMag love food, we managed to get in touch with Pison of “Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu” and ask him what happens behind the scenes.

Q: What inspired you to start Ropuhan Di Tanak Wagu?

Pison: I wanted to reintroduce the food our ancestors used to eat to the modern Sabahan. It bothers me that there are so many youngsters that have no clue about our local traditional cuisine and how to prepare it. It also bothers me that our food scene in Sabah is pretty much influenced by other prominent community style of cooking.

I also wanted to share new and improved local tradition recipes with my fellow Sabahan and to convince them that our produce are on par with imported goods.  It is to let people see that Malaysian food is not just about the Malays, Chinese and Indians.

Our local food deserves equal attention and exposure too.

Q: Where do you learn all the recipes from?

Pison: Most of the traditional recipes I learnt from my late grandma, while the fusion recipes are from me.

Q: What was the first recipe that you made for your video channel?

Pison: Kinahut Sangop / Cucumber salad

Q: When filming your videos, did you first practise the steps in preparing your dishes or were they all done spontaneously?

A: They were done spontaneously because I’m very familiar with these dishes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiqbDhs5HTY

Q: To date, how many recipes have you posted online and do you have any personal favourite recipe or videos? If yes, why?

Pison: I think I’ve made more than 30 videos so far and my personal favourite is Pinarasakan Koruk because I grew up eating this dish. I remembered catching this koruk fish in the paddy field with my late grandma when I was a little boy. It was fun catching the fish in the mud. 

Q: What was the most difficult recipe to prepare and film?

Pison: The most difficult recipe is Butterfly pea chicken ceviche; I had to find the freshest of chicken in the market. I also shot this video handheld while my other hand was preparing the ceviche.

Q: I am curious about you ‘mayonnaise tuhau’. To those who only watch your videos (but haven’t tried cooking your dishes), how would you describe the taste and what were people’s reaction when you first posted about it?

Pison: It actually tasted like normal mayonnaise, sweet, creamy and sour but a little bit spicy with tuhau flavour. Many people were shocked at first with the tuhau mayonnaise video. Most of them were curious with the taste.

Q: Are there any traditional recipes that you want to try but yet to post online?

Pison: I wanted to try making smoked meat using traditional methods.

Q: If you have the opportunity, is there any local Sarawakian dishes that you would like to learn how to cook one day?

Pison: I would like to try cooking Kelabit nuba’ Sepi-ung (rice cooked inside pitcher plants) and Kiran Pinidang or Narar (sundried Bua’ Kiran)

If you want to learn more about traditional Sabahan dishes, check out his Facebook, Instagram or Youtube channel.

KajoAsks: Pops and Pints, your not-so-typical everyday ice-cream

Instead of vanilla or strawberry, would you try Terung Dayak flavoured ice-cream or even a sago smoothie if you had the choice?

While this may sound a bit far-fetched for you, for Sabah-based ice-cream creator, Pops and Pints, they thrive on creating a list of intriguing and bizarre flavours.

popsandpints 1
Image source: Pops and Pints

For Pops and Pints, conventional flavoured ice-cream like vanilla and chocolate weren’t interesting enough, they chose to infuse their ice creams with local flavours instead.

popsandpints 10
Image source: Pops and Pints

And that is why dessert enthusiasts will enjoy their exciting new flavours.

Based in Kota Kinabalu, Pops and Pints was co-founded by siblings Yapp Khin Enn and Yapp Shin Enn and their friend Jude Limus in 2017.

popsandpints 12
Image source: Pops and Pints

The idea of Pops and Pints first started when Kihn Enn was previously studying in Australia when she began experimenting with cooking different food.

For Khin Enn there were so many things that she wanted to eat, but it was too expensive to eat out and so she started experimenting and making her own food.

And when she got back home, the weather was so hot that she tried turning all those ideas into cold food.

As of now, Pops and Pints specialiseS in providing delivery of their products to events and local shops.

For the love of quirky food, KajoMag managed to get in touch with Pops and Pints to ask about their creative confections.

Q: How many flavours has Pops and Pints created and could you give us some examples?

popsandpints 3 1
The Asian Flush – strawberry and bunga kantan with ginger biscuit crumbles

We have about 40-50 flavours to date. Some of the famous ones are Asian Flush (strawberries with bunga kantan), Asam Laksa (this needs no explanation and is very familiar to Malaysians), Culture Shock (yoghurt with granola), just to name a few.

Q: What was the initial reaction when you first came up with the idea of launching Pops and Pints? Were people sceptical or open to the idea of unconventional ice-cream flavours?

popsandpints 8
The M.O.B. – Mango on Berries

There was a mix of reactions. Generally, people know ice cream as something sweet, so when we introduced flavours less known to the public, some were sceptical but some were adventurous. Some enjoyed, some gave it a try, some did not like it. It’s fine because everyone has their own preference.

Q: What is the most peculiar ice-cream flavour that you has come up with and how would you describe the taste?

popsandpints asam laksa
Asam laksa flavour ice-cream

Asam Laksa is definitely one of them. It’s an eye catcher. Sweet, savoury and a little spicy.

Q: What is the most memorable comment that anybody has made about your ice-cream flavours?

popsandpints 11
The Smokehouse, topped with beef brisket, infused with French ice cream

The genuine reaction of people who tried some of our more interesting flavours and really liking them. Especially the flavours that they never thought they’d see in the form of ice cream.

Q: Will we ever get to see Pops and Pints in Sarawak?

popsandpints 6
Surprise Paradise – pineapple with Sichuan pepper and Uinah Ginger Beer

Hopefully.

Q: If you have the chance to open a Pops and Pints in Sarawak, what flavours would you consider creating for local customers?

popsandpints 4
Bambangan coconut ice cream with tuhau serunding sprinkled over

We would definitely love to work with local ingredients that are familiar to the locals. For instance, we made a Bambangan flavoured ice cream, which we believe is called asam embang/ buah mawang in Sarawak, and that drew some attention with the locals here.

To know more, check out their Facebook and Instagram page.

1 3 4 5 6 7 9